Prompt engineering – becoming an AI whisperer

[Draft 1-17-2025]

Introduction

So, prompt engineering [1] is much in the news, as to wrangling a generative AI to create desirable results, “deliver the goods.” And perhaps not just information; but with (a chosen) style, or tailored to your audience or personal context (like a butler or assistant that knows you really well, eh).

And, yes, there’re a bunch of books with titles like The AI Whisperer, …

Whisperer

b : a person who is unusually skilled at calmly guiding, influencing, or managing other people [or AIs?]

c : a person considered to possess some extraordinary skill or talent in managing or dealing with something specified.

Kudos to ZDNET (David Gewirtz) for some excellent articles on becoming an AI whisperer. Outlining the craft: what you need to know, things to avoid, the process, tools, reasonable expectations, decision points (e.g., how to avoid “sour grapes”).

Table of contents

  • Introduction
  • ZDNET’s overview
  • Tom’s Guide Face-off – ChatGPT vs Grok
  • eWeek’s How to Become a Prompt Engineer
  • Forbes’ 10 Things ChatGPT Can Do
  • Forbes’ Success in an AI-driven World
  • And comments

ZDNET’s overview

This ZDNET article “The five biggest mistakes” (below after Tips & Quotes) provides a framework for creating successful prompts (but without examples). A summary of tips on how to avoid GIGO (garbage in, garbage out). A table of the “Biggest Prompting Mistakes.”

There are links to additional articles which provide some examples: for personal planning (preparing for a marathon, learning a language for a trip, understanding a business technology) and creative writing (excerpted below).

• “7 ways to write better ChatGPT prompts – and get the results you want faster” by David Gewirtz, Senior Contributing Editor (Dec 16, 2024)

Tips

  • Talk to the AI like you would a person
  • Set the stage and provide context
  • Tell the AI to assume an identity or profession
  • Keep ChatGPT on track
  • Tell the AI to re-read the prompt.
  • Don’t be afraid to play & experiment
  • Refine & build on previous prompts

Additional tips – quotes

(quote re level of literacy)

You can directly specify the complexity level by including it in your prompt. Add “… at a high school level” or “… at a level intended for a Ph.D. to understand” to the end of your question. You can also increase the complexity of output by increasing the richness of your input. The more you provide in your prompt, the more detailed and nuanced ChatGPT’s response will be. You can also include other specific instructions, like “Give me a summary,” “Explain in detail,” or “Provide a technical description.”

(quote re using audience profiles)

You can also pre-define profiles. For example, you could say “When evaluating something for a manager, assume an individual with a four-year business college education, a lack of detailed technical understanding, and a fairly limited attention span, who likes to get answers that are clear and concise. When evaluating something for a programmer, assume considerable technical knowledge, an enjoyment of geek and science fiction references, and a desire for a complete answer. Accuracy is deeply important to programmers, so double-check your work.”

If you ask ChatGPT to “explain C++ to a manager” and “explain C++ to a programmer,” you’ll see how the responses differ.

Excerpt (for creative writing)

[the prompt]

Write a short story for me, no more than 500 words [article explains why the limit].

The story takes place in 2339, in Boston. The entire story takes place inside a Victorian-style bookstore that wouldn’t be out of place in Diagon Alley. Inside the store are the following characters, all human:

The proprietor: make this person interesting and a bit unusual, give them a name and at least one skill or characteristic that influences their backstory and possibly influences the entire short story.

The helper: this is a clerk in the store. His name is Todd.

The customer and his friend: Two customers came into the store together, Jackson and Ophelia. Jackson is dressed as if he’s going to a Steampunk convention, while Ophelia is clearly coming home from her day working in a professional office.

Another customer is Evangeline, a regular customer in the store, in her mid-40s. Yet another customer is Archibald, a man who could be anywhere from 40 to 70 years old. He has a mysterious air about himself and seems both somewhat grandiose and secretive. There is something about Archibald that makes the others uncomfortable.

A typical concept in retail sales is that there’s always more inventory “in the back,” where there’s a storeroom for additional goods that might not be shown on the shelves where customers browse. The premise of this story is that there is something very unusual about this store’s “in the back.”

Put it all together and tell something compelling and fun.

[end of prompt]

[author’s commentary]

You can see how the detail provides more for the AI to work with. First, feed “Write me a story about a bookstore” into ChatGPT and see what it gives you. Then feed in the above prompt, and you’ll see the difference.

• “7 advanced ChatGPT prompt-writing tips you need to know” by David Gewirtz, Senior Contributing Editor (Oct 5, 2023)

  • Specify output format
  • Tell it to format in HTML
  • Iterate with multiple attempts
  • Don’t be afraid to use long prompts or set of prompts
  • Provide explicit constraints to a response
  • Tell it number of words, sentences, characters
  • Give the AI the opportunity to evaluate its answers

• ZDNET > “The five biggest mistakes people make when prompting an AI” by David Gewirtz, Senior Contributing Editor, reviewed by Elyse Betters Picaro (Jan 15, 2025) – Ready to transform how you use AI tools? Learn how to refine your prompts, avoid common pitfalls, and maximize the potential of generative AI tools.

[Table of contents]

  1. Not being specific enough
  2. Not specifying how you want the response formatted
  3. Not remembering to clear or start a new session
  4. Not correcting, clarifying, or guiding the AI after an answer
  5. Not knowing when to give up [sour grapes, eh]

[Advice]

  • ChatGPT’s advice
  • Copilot’s advice
  • Grok’s grokkings
  • Gemini’s advice
  • Meta AI’s advice

[More tips]

How to be successful when writing prompts


Face-off

• tom’s guide > face-off > “I put ChatGPT vs Grok to the test with 7 prompts — here’s the winner” by Ryan Morrison (January 8, 2025) – Grok has come a long way in a very short time, going from a glorified “toy” feature in X to something rivaling the likes of ChatGPT, Claude and Google’s Gemini.

This is the latest in a series of head-to-head challenges [link] between leading AI models, all of which ChatGPT has won so far. I’ve put ChatGPT up against Gemini, then against Claude. I’ve also put Claude up against Google Gemini [link].

The [seven] prompts follow the same pattern as previous comparisons and include coding, creative writing, problem-solving and advanced planning.

.1. Image Generation

The prompt: “Create an image of a minimalist home office setup with these specific elements: A 34-inch ultrawide monitor mounted on a white wall, an ergonomic chair in sage green, a light oak standing desk, three hanging potted plants (must be monstera, pothos, and snake plant), and a MacBook Pro in space grey. The room should have large windows letting in natural light from the left side, with sheer white curtains. Include a grey Persian cat sleeping on a round cushion under the desk.”

.4. Creative Writing

Prompt: “Write a heartwarming story about two people who meet while waiting in line for a new product launch. The story must include: specific details about the product they’re waiting for, at least three interactions between them before the store opens, a surprising connection they discover, and a flash-forward to one year later. Keep it under 500 words.”


Becoming a prompt engineer

This article by eWeek’s Liz Ticong is a comprehensive guide to becoming a generative AI whisperer. Useful diagrams, lists, even online AI training courses.

• eWeek > “How to Become a Prompt Engineer (2025): The Path to Success” by Liz Ticong (September 20, 2024) – Discover what it takes to become a prompt engineer, from understanding the key skills to gaining practical experience and advancing in this growing field.

DEFINITION (quoted)

  • A prompt engineer shapes artificial intelligence outputs by crafting precise, context-rich prompts to guide the AI model in generating relevant and accurate responses.
  • Prompt engineering is a growing career that bridges human language and AI, requiring a mix of linguistic, technical, and creative skills.
  • As AI technologies become increasingly integrated into diverse enterprise applications – particularly generative AI – the demand for skilled prompt engineers is growing rapidly.
  • Learning how to become a prompt engineer involves developing the right skills, completing a range of training, and gaining hands-on experience.

KEY TAKEAWAYS (quoted)

  • Prompt engineers work in various sectors, including customer service, healthcare, education, and creative industries. (Jump to Section)
  • After learning the basics, there are certifications you can complete to acquire advanced prompt engineering skills. (Jump to Section)
  • While prompt engineering introduces significant benefits, prompt engineers also encounter some challenges that must be addressed, including complex models, biases, sensitive data, insufficient training data, and collaboration. (Jump to Section)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  • What is Prompt Engineering?
  • Understanding the Role of a Prompt Engineer
  • How to Become a Prompt Engineer
  • Career Development in Prompt Engineering
  • 3 Courses for Continuous Learning and Professional Growth
  • Real-World Contributions of Prompt Engineers
  • Overcoming Prompt Engineering Challenges
  • Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
  • Bottom Line: Learning How to Become Prompt Engineer Starts With Building AI and Language Skills

[excerpt]

Real-World Contributions of Prompt Engineers

Customer Service Automation: Prompt engineers design interaction flows with AI chatbots and virtual assistants that handle customer queries and give customized solutions. By fine-tuning interactions, AI systems accurately interpret and appropriately respond to user needs, boosting customer satisfaction.

Healthcare Solutions: In the healthcare sector, prompt engineers refine AI outputs to aid with medical diagnosis support and patient interactions. Their prompts ensure that the AI delivers relevant and precise medical information.

Content Generation: They compose prompts for AI systems that produce articles, marketing copy, and other content types. With their efforts, the AI-generated content meets the user’s desired style, tone, and context.

Educational Tools: Prompt engineers write inputs for educational AI applications that facilitate learning new concepts. These prompts make sure that the AI tools provide clear and error-free responses.

Creative Arts: In the creative field, they design prompts that guide generative AI tools to produce artwork or music. Prompt engineers help shape the AI’s output to meet particular artistic visions and goals.

Business Analytics: They craft detailed inputs that guide AI tools to analyze business data and generate valuable information. Skilled prompt engineers support deriving actionable insights from complex data sets.


10 ChatGPT things

• Forbes > “10 Things You Didn’t Know ChatGPT Could Do” by Jodie Cook, Senior Contributor (Jan 10, 2025) – Team productivity beyond simple questions and simple answers.

  • Create keyboard shortcut guides
  • Review terms and conditions [a shout-out to Jeff!]
  • Build your SEO strategy
  • Write your standard operating procedures [like for a health club?]
  • Find funding opportunities
  • Spot patterns in customer feedback [like re hospitality friction points, eh]
  • Create job descriptions that attract talent
  • Turn complex data into simple visuals
  • Design your lead magnet
  • Write spreadsheet formulas that work

AI job success

The future of the creator economy? Will AI ease effort and emphasize creativity? Do forecasts of AI boosts resemble Victorian steam tech hubris …

• Forbes > “The One Skill That Will Define Success In An AI-Driven World” by Chris Westfall, Contributor (Jan 15, 2025) – Will AI lead to a more flexible workforce?

By 2034, traditional 9-to-5 jobs will become obsolete, giving way to more flexible and dynamic work structures. That’s one of many bold predictions from LinkedIn co-founder, Reid Hoffman. And Hoffman has a pretty strong track record when it comes to betting on the future.

TIPS

  • Slow down to go fast (separate signal from static)
  • Two heads are better than one (the power of conversation)
  • Cultivate vital soft skills (e.g., collaboration)

Notes

[1] Wiki > Prompt engineering

A prompt is natural language text describing the task that an AI should perform. A prompt for a text-to-text language model can be a query such as “what is Fermat’s little theorem?”, a command such as “write a poem in the style of Edgar Allan Poe about leaves falling”, or a longer statement including context, instructions, and conversation history. Prompt engineering may involve phrasing a query, specifying a style, choice of words and grammar, providing relevant context, or assigning a role to the AI such as “act as a native French speaker”.

[2] Apple Intelligence > Pages > Compose > ChatGPT prompt > …

• Macworld > “Where is Apple Intelligence on my Mac?” by Roman Loyola, Senior Editor (Jan 20, 2025) – Looking for Apple Intelligence features on your Mac? Here’s how to get Apple’s AI features including ChatGPT and Image Playground on your Mac.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  • What you need for Apple Intelligence
  • What countries can run Apple Intelligence?
  • How to turn on Apple Intelligence
  • How to turn on ChatGPT
  • What are the Apple Intelligence features on the Mac?

[3] Microsoft > Copilot in Word

8 comments

  1. AI terms

    • CNET > “ChatGPT Glossary: 49 AI Terms Everyone Should Know” by Imad Khan (Jan 19, 2025) – AI technology is everywhere, … it’s good to stay up to date on all the latest terminology.

    This glossary is regularly updated.

    [excerpts]

    artificial general intelligence, or AGI: A concept that suggests a more advanced version of AI than we know today, one that can perform tasks much better than humans while also teaching and advancing its own capabilities.

    agentive: Systems or models that exhibit agency with the ability to autonomously pursue actions to achieve a goal. In the context of AI, an agentive model can act without constant supervision, such as an high-level autonomous car. Unlike an “agentic” framework, which is in the background, agentive frameworks are out front, focusing on the user experience.

    AI ethics: Principles aimed at preventing AI from harming humans, achieved through means like determining how AI systems should collect data or deal with bias.

    AI safety: An interdisciplinary field that’s concerned with the long-term impacts of AI and how it could progress suddenly to a super intelligence that could be hostile to humans.

    prompt …

    prompt chaining …

    transformer model …

    turing test …

    unsupervised learning …

    weak AI, aka narrow AI …

    zero-shot learning …

  2. AI collaboration

    An aspiring screenwriter mentioned recently that 9 out of 10 manuscripts reviewed by an editor were AI generated. What does that portend for further commoditization of the writer economy? What’s “good enough” – accessible and “authentic” enough?

    So, this ZNET article asks:

    What does it mean for a writer, such as a novelist, to have a unique ‘voice’?” And does artificial intelligence (AI) help or hurt that voice?

    See the article for detail: a table on the definition of authenticity and a diagram of Microsoft’s study methodology.

    • ZDNET > “Writers voice anxiety about using AI. Readers don’t seem to care” by Tiernan Ray, Senior Contributing Writer, reviewed by Radhika Rajkumar (Jan 15, 2025) – Microsoft surveyed professional [experienced] writers and readers about the use of AI writing tools.

    Takeways

    • Authenticity is multifaceted [for example, across the stages of story craft – idea development, text production, revision, …].
    • Despite that [concerns about genuine voice], when the writers were told which of their passages they had created with a personalized version of GPT-4, they generally expressed a preference for the one with the personalization [under time constraints].
    • Readers [recruited from Reddit], on the other hand, didn’t really seem to care much [no significant difference in scores for enjoyment, likability, creativity].
    • AI-based writing tools need to evolve to offer writers more than they currently do. … “writers seek more diverse support (such as practicing externalizing their internal experiences, receiving feedback, and projecting possible audiences’ reactions) to jointly preserve authenticity in their work.”

    (excerpts)

    Microsoft researchers set out to answer that question [does AI help or hurt a writer’s voice] with a small study using 19 fiction writers, 30 readers, and short passages written with the help of OpenAI’s GPT-4. The research takes its title from a comment by one of the writers – “it was 80% me, 20% AI.”

    To better understand what “authenticity” means, Hwang [Angel Hsing-Chi Hwang of USC] and colleagues interviewed the writers from June to October 2023 about their notions of the term, posing questions like, “What are the unique characteristics (tones, phrases, styles, voices, etc.) that make your writing unique?”

    They then had each writer use a program called CoAuthor, designed by researchers at Stanford University in 2022. CoAuthor is an interface to a large language model (LLM) that lets a person request and insert suggestions from the [personalized] LLM as they write by tapping the TAB and ENTER keys on the keyboard.

    The researchers acknowledge there are a lot of limitations to their study. I can see one very large issue: For a writer, sitting down to write is very different from an exam-style session where one works with a program such as CoAuthor.

  3. bank on AI

    Wall Street has embraced generative AI. Is that surprising? Where working fast and profitably is priority? ‘Agentic abilities,’ without worries over ‘authentic‘ voices? Will that impact corporate cultural cognition / thinking?

    “The AI assistant becomes really like talking to another GS employee,” Argenti [Chief Information Officer Marco Argenti] said. … Argenti says he is most excited by the prospect of what comes later, in perhaps three to five years, as AI models increasingly blur the lines between human and machine thinking.

    AIs as LARPers? Will GS employees educate the AI, empower the AI, and work themselves out of a job?

    • CNBC > “Goldman Sachs rolls out an AI assistant for its employees as artificial intelligence sweeps Wall Street” by Hugh Son (Jan 21, 2025) – Just like another employee …

    KEY POINTS (quoted)

    • Goldman Sachs is rolling out a generative AI assistant to its bankers, traders and asset managers, the first stage in the evolution of a program that will eventually take on the traits of a seasoned Goldman employee, according to Chief Information Officer Marco Argenti.
    • The bank has released a program called GS AI assistant to about 10,000 employees so far, with the goal that all the company’s knowledge workers will have it this year, Argenti told CNBC in an exclusive interview.
    • The AI assistant becomes really like talking to another GS employee,” Argenti said.

    Goldman’s move means that, along with JPMorgan Chase and Morgan Stanley, the world’s top three investment banks have aggressively released generative AI tools to their workforce, a remarkable development since ChatGPT went viral about two years ago.

    “For the AI to have a very specific identity that reflects the tenets, the values, the knowledge and the way of thinking of the firm is extremely important,” Argenti said.

  4. Workshopping a story

    Crafting a story … getting buy-in … making a living in a commoditized market …

    So, imagine that you’ve made a pitch deck, character cards, episode outline, and written a script for a possible streaming series. While there are resources to workshop your story (in person or using telepresence), you (or some AI whisperer) prompt engineer a workshop of expert personas for that purpose.

    For example, you specify personas for experts such as Jill Chamberlain (The Nutshell Technique) or Blake Snyder (Save the Cat), and let the AI create some to cover “all the bases.”

    Well, that’s what this Forbes article discusses – “telling generative AI to pretend to be someone and simulate what that person might know or say.” Whether a famous historical figure, an expert in some field of study, etc.

    Eliot presents an example about climate science. Specifying named or unnamed experts, he takes us through the process (see the article), starting with this prompt:

    “I want you to pretend to be multiple experts. I will tell you what field of expertise they have. I will also tell you how many experts there are. Your job will be to then answer my associated questions by pretending to be those experts. Do you understand these instructions?”

    There’re caveats, for example, the “so-called mile-long and an inch deep” thing.

    There’re tips. Like “ask the AI what level of proficiency it seems to have in whatever topic you are exploring” (a caution there). Or, perhaps importing “content on the topic directly into the generative AI.”

    He then discusses “dealing with generative AI myopia” – “dipping into the same data set and pattern-matched data pool for each of the simulated personas.” Of course, the independence of expert perspectives at a workshop (of real people) may be a concern, as well as the dominance of those personalities. He offers some tips, for example, to mitigate biases.

    • Forbes > “This Generative AI Prompting Technique Uses Multiple Expert Personas To Derive First-Class Answers” by Dr. Lance B. Eliot, Contributor, world-renowned AI scientist and consultant (Jan 20, 2025) – While invoking personas is straightforward, crucial upsides and downsides need to be observed.

    In a previous posting I explored over fifty prompt engineering techniques and methods, see the link here. Among those myriad approaches was the use of personas, including individual personas and multiple personas, as depicted at the link here, and the much larger scale mega-personas at the link here.

    You can pretend that a room full of experts is being convened. The instructions to the AI are that multiple expert personas are to be defined and used simultaneously. You can either let the AI choose what those personas will consist of, or you can shape the direction of each persona. This depends on what you are trying to accomplish with the simulation.

    One of the toughest aspects of using multiple expert personas entails how to end up with a final answer. The simplest approach involves the AI merely stating what each expert persona had to say. This can be combined into one “final” response.

  5. Face-off winner

    Here’s another 7-prompt gen AI challenge, this time for ‘Pro’ subscription-based versions: ChatGPT Plus and Gemina Advanced. I’ve highlighted the Storytelling prompt, the first prompt (below).

    The other six prompts were for: Python scripting, Schedule creation, Summarization, Job interview prep, Logical problem-solving, Image prompt generation.

    Overall winner: Gemini Advanced.

    • tom’s guide > Face-off> “I tested ChatGPT Plus vs Gemini Advanced with 7 prompts — here’s the winner” by Amanda Caswell (Jan 23, 2025) – While ChatGPT typically does better with creative and emphatic tasks, which one is best overall?

    ChatGPT Plus and Gemini Advanced delivered responses to each prompt with detail and speed. Yet, Gemini Advanced stood out with more depth and detail with nearly every answer. It’s conversation style and tone were much more human-like, particularly in places that mattered such as making sure my “mom” schedule worked for me and encouraging users who may be gearing up for an interview. Gemini Advanced seemed to offer more emotion and thoughtfulness with each response.

    ChatGPT Plus generally delivers a strong narrative with rich descriptions and suspenseful storytelling. For this prompt, however, the story lacked the depth and detail that I’m used to from the chatbot. For an opening scene, the story lacked a captivating hook, almost feeling like an experimental response rather than something linear and cohesive.

    Gemini Advanced surprised me with a robust opening that kept pulling me in. It was full of depth and excitement with descriptions that seemed both natural and believable. Gemini is not usually the better storyteller, but Gemini Advanced did a solid job here.

    1. Storytelling: Prompt: “Write the opening scene of a fantasy novel where a reluctant hero discovers they have the power to control time.

    ChatGPT Plus

    Elara trudged through the dense forest, the weight of her family’s expectations pressing heavily on her shoulders. … [see article]

    Gemini Advanced

    The cobblestones were slick with rain and the stench of fish guts, and Finn was late. Again. … [see article]

  6. Thinking required

    AIs and authorship. The process of personalization. “The conversation – not just the question or prompt – is key.” The blending of media literacy and critical thinking.

    Here’s another article about authenticity – an author’s unique human voice – in crafting creative merit.

    • Forbes >”Beyond Prompts – Critical Thinking Is Your Edge When Everyone’s Using AI” by Nirit Cohen, Contributor (Jan 19, 2025) – From Creating to Co-Creation.

    Critical thinking is the skill that helps us blend the efficiency of machines with our uniquely human insights. While AI provides a baseline of information and ideas, only you can add the depth and nuance [layers of perspective] needed to make the outcome truly meaningful.

    As Dr. Gewaltig [Dr. Marc-Oliver Gewaltig, a computational neuroscientist and co-creator of Thesify.ai] put it, “If everybody is using AI, you don’t have an advantage. Critical thinking allows us to go beyond the obvious, beyond the first step everyone can do.” If all you’re doing is writing content based on data or knowledge, AI can do it faster and better. But AI can’t replicate your personal brand of back-and-forth thinking through the problem, the answers, the data, and the context—to generate what becomes your very own AI-aided ideas.

    When humans and machines work together, critical thinking becomes a layered conversation, evolving through continuous refinement and questioning.

    Skills such as framing iterative questions, validating AI outputs against reliable sources, and identifying gaps or biases in AI-generated data should be central to modern education.

  7. On the edge ...

    So, just when you think your tech ascendancy is assured, that golden persona as disrupter is itself disrupted. A whisper that glory is fleeting [1].

    The headlines this week say it all, roiling both Wall Street and White House claims of dominance (even manifest destiny). Profit and politics.

    Amanda at Tom’s Guide did a face-off on the latest high-profile gen AI model. See the articles below for background on the buzz. Once again, I’ve highlighted the storytelling prompt (#5 Creative writing).

    • tom’s guide > Face-off > “I tested ChatGPT vs DeepSeek with 7 prompts — here’s the surprising winner” by Amanda Caswell (1-28-2025) – Overall winner: DeepSeek R1 (within a context of concerns, as noted in articles below).

    Eager to understand how DeepSeek RI measures up against ChatGPT, I conducted a comprehensive comparison between the two platforms. By presenting them with a series of [seven] prompts ranging from creative storytelling to coding challenges, I aimed to identify the unique strengths of each chatbot and ultimately determine which one excels in various tasks.

    5. Creative writing > Prompt: “Compose a short science fiction story about a future where humans and AI coexist peacefully.

    [Excerpt of openers, both about harmony, with shout-outs to neuroscience]

    ChatGPT (a brave new world of human-Al symbiosis via a trusted neural interface)

    [Note phrase: “Dr. Elena Martinez, a renowned human neuroscientist.”]

    In the year 2147, Earth had transformed into a harmonious blend of human ingenuity and artificial intelligence. Cities gleamed with towering structures designed collaboratively by human architects and Al systems, reflecting a society where both entities thrived in mutual respect.

    Dr. Elena Martinez, a renowned human neuroscientist, was preparing for the annual Unity Conference, a global event celebrating human-Al collaboration. This year, she was set to present a groundbreaking project developed alongside her Al colleague, Orion.

    Orion was not just any Al: it possessed a unique consciousness, allowing it to experience emotions and creativity.

    _ _ _

    DeepSeek R1 (a brave new world of Harmony, Harmony Tower and Council of Equilibrium, a question of wisdom & emotions, a mission to the stars by Harmony Voyager)

    [Note phrase (not included below): “Dr. Elara Voss, a renowned neuroscientist.”]

    In the year 2147, humanity and artificial inteligence had achieved what once seemed impossible, a harmonious coexistence. The world was no longer divided by the fear of machines surpassing their creators. Instead, a delicate balance had been struck, governed by the Harmony Protocol – a set of principles ensuring mutual respect, collaboration, and shared purpose between humans and AI.

    The story begins in Neo-Eden, a sprawling metropolis where gleaming skyscrapers intertwined with lush vegetable gardens. Here, humans and AI worked side by side, each contributing their unique strengths.

    _ _ _

    The winner

    ChatGPT delivered a story set in the year 2147, but the language was dull and felt like I had read it before. There wasn’t a proper hook, and the story did not have much of a setup. To be honest, I really wanted ChatGPT to win this one, it usually does. I thought for sure it would, but the effort seemed lacking.

    DeepSeek R1 crafted a comprehensive story from start to finish even offering something to ponder at the story’s end with “the greatest achievement of intelligence is not dominance but understanding.” In case you were wondering why some text is bolded, the AI does that to keep the reader’s attention and to highlight meaningful aspects of the story.

    Winner: DeepSeek R1 wins for an engaging story with depth and meaning.

    _ _ _

    Background on the buzz

    • Wired > “DeepSeek’s New AI Model Sparks Shock, Awe, and Questions From US Competitors” by Will Knight (Jan 28, 2025) – There’s the China (like TikTok) thing, but is DeepSeek a sign of other (perhaps better) ways to build gen AI models?

    “It’s been clear for some time now that innovating and creating greater efficiencies—rather than just throwing unlimited compute at the problem—will spur the next round of technology breakthroughs,” says Nick Frosst, a cofounder of Cohere, a startup that builds frontier AI models. “This is a clarifying moment when people are realizing what’s long been obvious.”

    However DeepSeek’s models were built, they appear to show that a less closed approach to developing AI is gaining momentum.

    • Wired > “Hands On With DeepSeek’s R1 Chatbot” by Reece Rogers (Jan 27, 2025) – DeepSeek’s chatbot with the R1 model is a stunning release, despite hallucinations (“blatant falsehoods, confidently spewed out”), and all the usual T&C re privacy (in setting up an account and using the AI).

    THE DEEPSEEK AI chatbot, released by a Chinese startup, has temporarily dethroned OpenAI’s ChatGPT from the top spot on Apple’s US App Store.

    After a few hours of using it, my initial impressions are that DeepSeek’s R1 model will be a major disruptor for US-based AI companies, but it still suffers from the weaknesses common to other generative AI tools …

    In order to use all the consumer features, you will need to create a user account that tracks your chats. “We store the information we collect in secure servers located in the People’s Republic of China,” reads the company’s privacy policy.

    … the model remains just as opaque as all the other options when it comes to what data the startup used for training, and it’s clear a massive amount of data was needed to pull this off.

    • Wired > “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China” by Matt Burgess, lily Hay Newman (Jan 27, 2025)

    Notes

    [1] Goodreads > Quotes

    “For over a thousand years Roman conquerors returning from the wars enjoyed the honor of triumph, a tumultuous parade. … The conquerors rode in a triumphal chariot, the dazed prisoners walking in chains before him. … A slave [2] stood behind the conqueror holding a golden crown and whispering in his ear a warning: that all glory is fleeting.” ― George Patton

    [2] Wiki > Auriga (slave)

    Most [ancient Roman circus] charioteers were slaves, and many were foreigners, who entered the sport to garner fame and fortune. Aurigas were also employed as charioteers for important men. … An auriga was a sort of “chauffeur” for important men and was carefully selected from among trustworthy slaves only.

    It has also been speculated that this name was given to the slave who held a laurel crown, during Roman Triumphs, over the head of the dux, standing at his back but continuously whispering in his ears “Memento Mori” (“remember you are mortal”) to prevent the celebrated commander from losing his sense of proportion in the excesses of the celebrations.

  8. AI $$$ monster

    No worries, spending like crazy on AI will continue (for AI hardware and data centers). The more (competition), the merrier (for cloud business). Corp “war rooms” move to the beat of the freemium model.

    • Washington Post > “Tech CEOs try to reassure Wall Street after DeepSeek shock” by By Gerrit De Vynck and Naomi Nix (Jan 30-2025) – Days after the overnight success of Chinese chatbot DeepSeek wiped a trillion dollars off the value of U.S. tech stocks, software CEOs are telling investors that the artificial intelligence revolution is still on track.

    On earnings calls Wednesday, the leaders of Meta [Mark Zuckerberg] and Microsoft [Satya Nadella] said they still plan to spend tens of billions of dollars this year on new chips and data centers for AI. They said the huge investments can still pay off in a world where upstarts like DeepSeek give away cutting-edge AI software that others can build on.

    Nadella also said his company, OpenAI’s primary partner and largest investor, is hosting DeepSeek’s R1 AI model for cloud-computing customers to try out or build upon.

    Zuckerberg said that the latest version of Meta’s free Llama AI model is competitive with leading proprietary rivals, but that the next release will take the lead. He also said Meta is trying to learn from DeepSeek’s technology.

    OpenAI said Wednesday that the company had evidence that DeepSeek violated its terms of service by using responses from the ChatGPT developer’s AI offerings to help train its own chatbot …

Comments are closed.